I recently started watching Breaking Bad. And by “started” I mean I started with episode one, and then blew through the whole series up to last season’s finale in about two weeks. At first, I really identified with Walt and his quest to provide for his family by any means necessary. But let me get into that more troubling theme. …
Walter’s Path Through Violence
Firstly, Walt’s path toward financial and social independence almost immediately takes him down a path of violence. Once he’d been told he was going to die, Walt had little inclination to satisfy societal norms of conduct. For example, when a group of older boys makes fun of Walt Jr.’s speech and mannerisms (an effect of his cerebral palsy) at a clothing store, Walt takes no time to confront the boys or ask them to stop, he simply jumps straight to violence, kicking the ringleader in the knee and punching him. In this scene, you can see that Walt has no patience or desire to conform to the societal controls that once prevented him from reacting in socially-unacceptable ways. In essence, his base masculine desires come to the forefront with little to no inhibitions.
After that first incident, violence seems to come increasingly easier for Walt, as he attacks two drug dealers who want to kill him, killing one in self defense but eventually killing the other in an act of self-preservation. From this point on, Walt either uses violence or counsels Jesse to act violently as a solution to most problems. Eventually, Walt becomes almost completely desensitized to violence, to the point that he murders two drug dealers at point-blank range to protect Jesse, showing no apparent emotion or remorse after the fact, and subsequently orders the death of Gale Boetticher, a friend, to save his own life.
Although much of the violence of the show is framed within the context of self-preservation, it becomes apparent that — as the story progresses — Walt becomes less and less concerned about collateral damage and begins to see violence as a first line of defense to solve problems.
Reclaiming Masculinity Through Male Dominance
Although violence against others is a tool Walt uses to control others and his own life, the show also demotes women to a subservient role as Walt becomes more powerful through displays of masculinity. And, although there are only a handful of women who have appeared on the show (Skyler, Marie, Jane, and Andrea), Skyler is the main female protagonist and best displays the shows backlash against strong women.
At the beginning of the series, Skyler is clearly the head of the White household. Although she is pregnant and fulfills most of the stereotypical female duties — like making breakfast, cleaning the house, etc. — it is very clear that Skyler dominates Walter in most aspects of their life. As a woman with a strong personality and physically dominating presence (she is roughly Walter’s equal in height and weight), she runs the house, tells Walter and Walter Jr. what to do, where to go, and how to act; and blatantly disregards Walter’s wishes to keep his cancer diagnosis a secret, further illustrating that Walter has no control.
Perhaps his emasculation is best illustrated in the first episode, when Skyler does Walter a “favor” by sexually stimulating him on his birthday. Although he doesn’t want to — because she’s busy bidding on an E-bay item at the same time, and it is clear he’d rather have actual sex — she imposes her will on him and he reluctantly accepts, only to be interrupted when she wins her E-bay bid. This act shows that Skyler has no regard for Walt’s sexual needs, and by imposing her will on him in such an intimate way, she shows that Walt cannot even impose his manhood in the bedroom — perhaps the most emasculating blow of all.
But as Walter begins to throw off the societal castration that he feels he has been dealt, Skyler rapidly descends into the stereotypical nagging wife. She begins to poke her nose where she shouldn’t, even when Walter expressly tells her not to, and she becomes not the voice of reason on the show, but rather the impediment that keeps Walter from fulfilling his manly duties to provide for his family.
In fact, in counterpoint to Walter and Skyler’s initial sexual encounter, once Walter becomes successful at cooking and selling meth, he immediately goes home and ravishes his wife in a way — made clear by the context — he has not done in a long time. This symbolic physical act is meant to show us that Walter is no longer a social eunuch, but a master in his own home.
As the show progresses, Sklyer eventually becomes complicit in Walter’s illegal activities and begins to function as his employee in a subservient role to his newly-masculine self. Once she has made the transition to lesser partner in his meth business, she no longer has power over Walter, and can only react to his successes and failures instead of acting on her own impulses and moral objections to his work.
Masculinity and Oppression
At its current state, Breaking Bad has managed to metaphorically give Walter his balls back by allowing him to triumph through violence and subvert his once strong (and domineering) wife into a lesser role where he has control over her.
Although there is an argument to be made that the emasculating of the American male is a theme rarely explored in movies and television, the manner in which Walter frees himself from societal and feminine oppression is questionable and hints that perhaps the show is moving away from the somewhat precarious objective of reclaiming masculinity, instead moving toward misogyny.
James Ged is a writer and TV addict who spends most of his days blogging for CableTV.com, but he also posts cool TV memes and news at TV Buzzer.
Nah.
The only misogyny in “Breaking Bad” is under the greater umbrella of misanthropy. What I mean is that yes, I think you can say that there’s some pretty serious women-hating in the show, but only because the show takes a pretty dim view of humanity itself.
Further, and more importantly, the entire thesis of your article rests on the premise that Walt himself is a misogynist. This may be true, but the next question you have to ask yourself is whether the show wants us to agree with Walt’s misogyny or not.
I’d argue no, it doesn’t, just as the show’s moral universe isn’t all that keen on Walt’s meth-dealing or murdering either.
You can’t take a show to task for being misogynistic simply because it depicts act of misogyny. You have to determine if those depictions are to be interpreted as good or bad by the audience (or if the show is unaware of the misogyny, which is something else entirely).
Walt is clearly a compromised character. And what seems like a victory in Season One — the aggressive sex — is an obvious sign of his moral decay in early Season Two. If you’ll remember, he attempts a similar attack on Skyler in the first third of Season Two and she reacts negatively to him. The encounter in Season Two is staged almost exactly like the one in Season One yet it’s depicted like a rape. This indicates to me that Gilligan was well aware that Walt’s actions in Season One weren’t something to be celebrated, but rather yet another indication that his moral compass is completely shattered.
Finally, to quote Freud, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. I think it’s unfair to call misogyny on this show largely on the basis of one scene of agressive sex. Finding one’s sexuality as sign of character growth is not unique to this show — “The Big C” springs immediately to mind as a show in which a woman facing a similar prognosis finds sexual fulfillment in the arms of a man who’s not her husband — and one rough night of sex does not a misogynist make. (If so, I think every married couple in America would probably be fodder for an undergraduate Feminist Studies’ paper. Incidentally, the one about me and my wife will be called “I Think The Man in the Canoe is Hiding: Excuses for Sexual Under-Performance in Early Middle Aged Men.” Or maybe just “Meh.”)
I might be taking your essay a little hard (ha! a pun!) because I feel like if you really need to call a show out for misogyny, there are about fifteen million candidates that you could have went after first — and more convincingly. “Two and a Half Men”, “Man Up”, and “Nancy Grace” to name just three.
(“Nancy Grace,” by the way, is misogynistic because anyone who watches that show comes away from it hating Nancy Grace so very much it can’t help but spread to how one feels about all women in general.)
Okay, thanks for reading this — did you read it? probably not — I’m going to go eat some crackers.
Completely agree, Jack!
The show constantly plays with the viewers sympathies and identification, to make us challenge our morals. How long will we root for Walt?
And what does it say about us if we still want him to win when he cooks meth, kills people, lets a young woman die, uses his adopted son as a hand puppet, poisons a child… Setting him as the hero at first was done only to make us question ourselves later.
In short, and because you said it better, I feel people who hate on Skyler and see her as the overpowering bitch in the story are misogynists. Not the show.