Its no secret that we all love Leverage around here. Scott likes Parker almost as much as I do. Bob has an unhealthy obsession with Christian Kane’s hair (I for the record, like the look). Deb has talked to producer Dean Devlin about the show. Season two is in full effect, and I’ve been going back and watching the first season via the recently released (and subject of a CliqueClack giveaway) DVD set. The extras on the set are outstanding, especially when you consider how quickly TNT churned out the set.
When it comes to special features, I’m a Commentary junkie. The work on this set was outstanding. Each episode has a recording, most hosted by creators John Rogers and Chris Downey, but producer (and director) Dean Devlin, writer Amy Berg, director Johnathan Frakes, and a host of others all show up. The sessions are fun to listen to, and are informative, so much so the full focus of this post was going to be all of the cool stuff I learned:
Other highlights in the features include a segment with Beth Riesgref playing a meeting with the writing team as a prima donna that just about made me fall off the couch laughing. They filmed the internal second season pick up announcement, which the cast and crew all thought was an online Q&A session until Devlin told them what was really going on. There were several decent featurettes, and then there were the Deleted Scenes. Aldis Hodge owned the Deleted Scenes. They share several of his improv runs, and I’ve got to tell you, the man has got a long future in this business.
Its a great set. The episodes are in the order that I think that they were intended to be shown, which is not really the same order I remember them. Or, I could be completely crazy (which really isn’t far from the truth no matter how you look at it). But, if I were crazy, maybe I’d be a good match for Parker?
I have a comment on the last paragraph about Nate and Sophie. John Rogers said that they knew Nate and Sophie wouldn’t work as a romantic couple in the first season from the very start when they started working with the actors, not when writing The First David Job. It was actually Timothy Hutton and Gina Bellman who made them realize that. They wouldn’t work because Nate was too screwed up in the first season to be ready for a relationship. He was still mourning the death of his son and was an alcoholic. They couldn’t work as the versions they are then, Nate an alcoholic and seeing his team as the criminals, as second class citizens and Sophie who still couldn’t let go of her criminal ways, who tried to con the team. But that’s the first season. The second season is like a fresh start for them, anything can happen when they start to change, Nate is no longer an alcoholic… we’ll see what happens next. There are definitely still sparks between them and I’m looking forward to see how they further develop their relationship.
*POST AUTHOR*
Huh. I’ll have to listen to it again.
Regardless of when they figured it out, I’m glad that they did. I do love Nate and Sophie, but I like the rest of the cast more.
Rogers actually said that bit about the actors helping them realize that early on in his blog.
My fave are Nate and Sophie but I like the rest as well.
Btw. part of what I said above can be heard at the end of the commentary for The 12-Step Job and the other part in The First David Job.
I have to admit I felt that the show seemed to force the Nate-Sophie connection a bit too much in the pilot. Plus, in the first half of Season 1, Sophie came across as unstable. However, in the second half Nate was unstable. Plus, as a woman, I sometimes bristled at his occasional ‘I know better than you’ attitude towards S. Yet, in between, I had issues as to my brown eye Timothy Hutton appeared at least 10-15 years older than the actress. Despite my misgivings, on screen the two had great chemistry and a great relationship, so S2 I found myself saddened to see Sophie had moved on, especially after declaring near-undying devotion towards the end of S1.
Small suggestion: get rid of “the the (…) would would” on the 4th bullet point…