George Costanza: Played by Jason Alexander, on the other hand, was anything but sane. I have to say that, after all of my viewings of the show, George is by far the most out there, and is definitely my favorite character of the bunch. His incessant need to build himself up through lies and deception may seem deplorable, but it actually made for a very interesting character study of what people will do to feel good about themselves. And, it’s pretty impressive that George had the ability to really follow through on many of his outrageous tales!
I love the progression that George makes from presumably successful real estate agent, all the way through to an executive at Kruger Industrial Smoothing (K-Uger!), with hilarious stops along the way as Sid’s replacement parking cars, a hand model, sales rep at Sanalac (rest stop supplies), Assistant to the Traveling Secretary for the New York Yankees, a board member of The Susan Biddle Ross Foundation, sales executive at Play Now, and a computer salesman for his father, Frank (Jerry Stiller).
George’s employment was the source of a lot of comedy on Seinfeld, and I have shed a lot of laughing tears watching him burrow in at Play Now, battle Lloyd Braun (Matt McCoy) to be named top computer salesman, drag the World Series trophy around in the parking lot of Yankee Stadium, and try to give a scholarship to a “C” average student, simply because the kid had aspirations of being an architect (George’s pretend profession).
Of course, the man had to have a social life as well, and how George landed all of those women, I’ll never know. He was the cause of his fiancees’ death (Heidi Swedberg as Susan Ross), after burning down her father’s cabin, and outing him as having had a homosexual extra-marital affair. George even converted to Latvian Orthodoxy for another girlfriend, Sasha (Jana Marie Hupp). It’s safe to say that George never did anything half-heartedly.
And yet, he serves as a true and loyal friend to everyone in the group, particularly to Jerry, his friend since childhood. While I certainly question the wisdom behind seeking advice from the man, George is always available for an opinion or thought, and he’s readily willing to admit when he actually knows the answer to something, versus when he’s making it up. Kind of a refreshing concept.
It goes without saying that his parents, Frank and Estelle (Estelle Harris), bear significant mentioning, but, I’ll save them for a little later.
Elaine Benes: Julia Louis-Dreyfus took a journey on Seinfeld as well, although hers had a lot more to do with appearance than anyone else’s journey did. When we first meet Elaine, she’s a very buttoned-up businesswomen, with bland outfits, and a high bun worth of hair. By the end of the series, Louis-Dreyfus’ astounding beauty is on full display, and I think that Louis-Dreyfus being herself allowed her character to really shine through whatever screens she may have been battling through in the beginning.
As unusual as it is to have an ex-girlfriend as a core member of your group, Elaine and Jerry enjoyed the relationship that they did because of their history. Clearly there was uncertainty in how to utilize the past, and in the first few seasons we got a lot of tinkering with the nature of the pair’s relationship. First friends, then friends with benefits, then a couple, then friends again, and later on, a shared sexual experience to allow Jerry the opportunity to bring Elaine to orgasm (he failed). Elaine’s beginning was not something that I enjoyed.
But the ride got past the bumps, and once Elaine was able to enjoy her own dating life, she really started to hum along. The revolving door of bums and losers that she paraded through the series was as astounding as that of Jerry and George, and I fully enjoyed each and every one of them. Of course, one in particular does stand out: David Puddy (Patrick Warburton). Man, was he awesome!
Of course, Elaine was also able to open a window into something that the guys couldn’t: namely, daily occurrences that men never encounter. The Sponge, the fake number given to the creepy guy, the son (and father) who are sexually attracted to her, the stalker, the Botticelli shoes, the catty colleague fight, the Korean manicurists, and, of course, her numerous run-ins with Frank Costanza. All of which not only gave us a great slice of Elaine, but also provided us with countless hours of laughter.
While, true to the pilot that Jerry and George write on the show, the series never originally intended to have a woman in that type of role (Elaine wasn’t introduced until the second episode), her adventures with Jerry, George, and Kramer, individually and collectively, are pure comedic gold. It’s a good thing that the show figured out how to make room for her.
I’m not the world’s biggest Seinfeld fan, but I feel as if people praise Seinfeld way too much. There are some very memorable episodes to me (ugly baby! George not willing to give up a parking space, the Chinese restaurant!). But, to be honest, the show is a particular type of comedy that simply appeals to vapid individuals.
*POST AUTHOR*
You seem to be calling yourself a fan to a certain extent; does that make you vapid like us? :-)
To a certain degree, yes. It’s just that all of the characters on Seinfeld are basically shallow and are all about themselves. That kind of unwavering selfishness reflects on its viewers. That’s the chord the show struck; the selfish fuck in all of us.
*POST AUTHOR*
That’s specifically the dissection that I was trying to avoid. We could argue forever about the merits of the characters as people. It’s just not worth it to me. I enjoy them for being funny, and for the purposes of this discussion, that’s good enough for me. I don’t think it says anything negative about us for not judging them.
Romano owes his success to David Letterman and “Home Improvement” started in ’91 while Seinfeld started in ’90, not much paving ‘o the way there if you ask me, but you have a point. You know I’d most likely phrase it that way myself but usually someone comes out of the woodwork and calls me out on my absolutes so here I am *dusts himself off of all the pine tree needles* ;-)
*POST AUTHOR*
I’m not attempting to draw straight lines here, but Jerry Seinfeld was definitely the test case for comedians going straight from night clubs to primetime. For that reason, the next generation owes him a debt of gratitude.
And, not that it makes such a huge difference, but The Seinfeld Chronicles premiered in July of 1989, over two years prior to Home Improvement’s September, 1991, premiere.
… dumps the pine tree needles all over Sebastian … (what the hell are we talking about?)
Whatever, I was thinking about how dopeheads are planting cannabis in national forests ;-)
See I knew you had more up your sleeve and of course you are right about this. But let me throw something back at you: Bill Cosby. Kevin Pollak said he’d been listening to Cosby’s standup records when he was a kid, acting as if he was Cosby (what’s that called? Adlibing? Pollak mentioned it, I’m too lazy to listen to 30 hours of podcasts again to find it). I just think that there were standup comics before Seinfeld who paved the way, even though they were less Successful. Cosby Show started in ’84.
OH and I hope you’ve seen
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0500140/
It’s really good.
*POST AUTHOR*
I’m glad you mentioned both things that you did! :-)
I own “I’m Telling You for the Last Time” on DVD, and once had it on CD, before a friend absconded with it, so I also have the tracks on my iPod. It’s awesome, and we will come back to it momentarily.
I also saw “Comedian” in some tiny theater in The Village (NY). Only people who like him appreciated it, which is to say that I loved it.
Anyway, I’m really glad you brought up Cosby. Bill Cosby was, and is, definitely a standup. However, he blazed the frontier for a different group of people: comedic actors. Back in Cosby’s day, you had to do standup in order to break into acting. So we had Steve Martin, and his brethren, who started out in the clubs, because that was the only way into funny roles. Cosby was actually on many things, including “I Spy”, “The Bill Cosby Show”, “The Electric Company”, and “Fat Albert”, to name a few, before “The Cosby Show”. By then he was an actor, and an accomplished one.
Whereas, Seinfeld blazed a path for all the guys who showed up at the cemetery in the opening of “I’m Telling You for the Last Time”. Yes, I know that someone like George Carlin was already established, but my point is that those guys, his contemporaries, were the comedians who scratched their way into acting, not comedic actors. That’s who Romano and Reiser (who was at the cemetery) were.
“Seinfeld” was really the beginning of an interesting decade of the networks giving shows to comedians who, by and large, did not have the comedic intellect of Seinfeld, Romano, Reiser, and others. The most recent iteration of the experiment is the “Sarah Silverman Program”.
I’m sure that Seinfeld paved the way for comedians to be the driving forces of their sitcoms…. however, you claim that Paul Reiser and Ray Romano lack comedic intellect. “Mad About You” mined its humor between a couple’s relationship, whereas, “Everybody Loves Raymond” took on the complexities of a family dynamic. The shows are all different and cannot just be lumped into a general category, as you seem wont to do.
*POST AUTHOR*
Sorry, but I’m specifically saying that Seinfeld, Romano, and Reiser are the ones with the high comedic IQ.
And, I’m not lumping anything into one category, other than shows helmed by standups. Check the Flashback category; I wrote a glowing post on Everybody Loves Raymond, too.
Ah yes you are right – I forgot that Cosby was well established – even more so I think his I Spy role fell together with “Shaft” and the rise of the Afro-American Cinema, right?
I’m sorry that I’m not “fluent” in these things, that was before I was born and I still proud myself for staying up till 0:30am for 9 years to watch every single episode of cheers – which ran opposite of “Frasier” during that time of day, followed by “Mad about you” and “Home Improvement” til 2am. Yes that was during my schooldays :-)
*POST AUTHOR*
I actually don’t know much about “I Spy”, other than that it existed, was successful, and helped boost Cosby’s career. :-) Could be.
I’m certainly not fluent either. Just a combination of things you pick up over the years when its of interest to you, and research.
You watched every episode of Cheers? I never got that show….
I’m a comedy nut. Ok I have to admit I watch almost everything else that’s good too but I’m really into comedy shows. I’m still pissed “Help Me Help You” didn’t get picked up for another season… but then again that might’ve prevented Ted Danson from playing the role of Arthur Frobisher on “Damages” so there’s a bright side there too…
But of course there are better comedy shows. “Frasier” still is at the top for me. Insanely funny show.
I never liked Seinfeld in its original run on german TV but got into it later on. I simply couldn’t get past all those “coincidences” – Ken Levine wrote about breaking the 4th wall recently on his blog and shared the insight that this is something that is established on the show therefor it’s ok (just like on “Curb your Enthousiasm” which I loathe because of those happenstances too).
Anyway I’m rambling I guess :-) I liked this post, just wanted to add that as a final note. You write too much about too many bad shows so this was a welcome change for you I guess ;-)
*POST AUTHOR*
I lucked into doing flashbacks on most of my favorites. It’s a nice opportunity to look back on real quality stuff!
my apologies for misreading.
*POST AUTHOR*
No worries.