CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

Seinfeld – CliqueClack Flashback

feature

SeinfeldCast

I had a friend growing up who was completely enamored with Seinfeld. He was one of those guys who drank in everything that their older brother had to offer, and so he picked up on the show, one that wasn’t really meant for those of us in junior high. Yet, even with his constant chatter about Seinfeld, his random quoting from Seinlanguage, even his dressing up as Kramer when the occasion called for it, I wasn’t interested.

In fact, none of us were. Sure, we all watched the series finale of the acclaimed sitcom, but that was just because it was something that you did. People talk about the unprecedented audience for the M*A*S*H finale, but part of that unbelievable number lay in the fact that that’s what you did: you watched the swan song of a legend. Of course, with no frame of reference for the series, I was left with a rather unsatisfied feeling when Seinfeld drew to a close. But, the show was over, and would surely drift into the night.

A few years later, as a college freshman, I knew a guy who was very into the whole Internet thingy. He would scour the web, capturing and burning all manner of shows that both were, and weren’t, on the air anymore. With nothing to keep me occupied during my time in college, I started to borrow random CDs from him, catching myself up on hundreds of hours of television that I’d never before seen. Among those discoveries? Seinfeld. And that’s where the love affair began.

Honestly, I was a bit stumped as to how to attack this project that I assigned myself. What do I say about a show so monumental, so groundbreaking, as Seinfeld? On the other hand, how do I fit all there is to say into one post? It may seem ridiculous, but this is not an easy task.

You see, for all the people who still don’t get Seinfeld today, there are hundreds, upon thousands, upon millions of us, who simply can’t get enough. Why do you think it’s constantly on television? I’ve seen the entire series at least a dozen times, and I keep on coming back for more.

I think it’s pointless to discuss the greater meaning of the series. For those in the know, there are ten opinions for every person, as to what made it so great. And for everyone who keeps refusing to take joy in the simple pleasure of comedy done right? If Jerry Seinfeld, Jason Alexander, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, and Michael Richards couldn’t convince you otherwise, I certainly won’t be able to articulate an argument here that’ll make you tune in. So let’s stick to our reminiscing.

Where to begin? Let’s start with the big four, and expand outward from there.

Jerry SeinfeldJerry Seinfeld: Played by Seinfeld himself, Jerry was the epicenter of this phenomenal masterpiece. Granted, Jerry never fully turned himself into an actor, but his growth in the field was an impressive effort, made by a man who never wanted to be one in the first place. Seinfeld was, and is, a comedian extraordinaire, and the brilliance of the show owes a lot to his writing, his humor, and his mind.

There’s a progression in the series that begins with Jerry as the lead and the ensemble as support, and culminates in an intricately interwoven set of four storylines that are all interrelated. And the amazing thing is that you couldn’t really see it coming. While the formula was in place for the latter six seasons, or so, each and every episode led us to believe that the main four characters were heading down solitary roads, only to discover at different points of the half hour that all of the paths naturally converged.

There’s a lacking today in sitcoms. No, I’m not simply referring to the quality, which is a given. More than that, is shows’ inability to really maintain an ensemble feel throughout the life of a single arc, let alone an entire series run. While many succeed on a one-off basis, none have managed to maintain the high level of writing and planning necessary to do so for the long haul. Jerry Seinfeld succeeded at many things on his show, and the biggest one of all was how he managed and nurtured it.

It puzzles me to this day how Jerry the character managed to date as many beautiful women as he did. I realize that it was television, but my guess is that Jerry the real person led this exact life. Even as a lowly standup. While I fully believe the legend that he’s not the nicest of people, his character clearly had a certain charm that made his life of leisure not only possible, but probable. I know that he struggled to find his footing (I’ve read Seinfeld: The Making of an American Icon, numerous times), but Jerry really did find success in nightclubs and on talk shows. He is one of the few who managed to break out of the pack, and really become a headliner.

Which is why, in real life, he blazed the path for comedians to television. Ray Romano, and Paul Reiser, to name but two, owe a large debt to the man known as Seinfeld. And he left behind another legacy that can’t be minimized: today, we constantly refer back to Seinfeld as a prime example of a show that would have never survived in the current environment of series turnover. Seinfeld bounced around the week, taking a few years to finds its audience … can anyone argue with the results?

I realize that I haven’t said much about Jerry Seinfeld the character, but the truth is that there isn’t a considerable amount that stands out about him from the show. Not to minimize how great he was, but rather to applaud the series on successfully utilizing Jerry as the center that the rest of the series’ crazy rotated around. As neurotic, and out-of-his-mind, as Jerry was, he was generally the voice of reason when it came to most matters. Which is exactly what he was supposed to be.

Photo Credit: NBC

16 Responses to “Seinfeld – CliqueClack Flashback”

June 24, 2009 at 6:01 PM

I’m not the world’s biggest Seinfeld fan, but I feel as if people praise Seinfeld way too much. There are some very memorable episodes to me (ugly baby! George not willing to give up a parking space, the Chinese restaurant!). But, to be honest, the show is a particular type of comedy that simply appeals to vapid individuals.

June 24, 2009 at 6:32 PM

You seem to be calling yourself a fan to a certain extent; does that make you vapid like us? :-)

June 24, 2009 at 10:13 PM

To a certain degree, yes. It’s just that all of the characters on Seinfeld are basically shallow and are all about themselves. That kind of unwavering selfishness reflects on its viewers. That’s the chord the show struck; the selfish fuck in all of us.

June 24, 2009 at 10:48 PM

That’s specifically the dissection that I was trying to avoid. We could argue forever about the merits of the characters as people. It’s just not worth it to me. I enjoy them for being funny, and for the purposes of this discussion, that’s good enough for me. I don’t think it says anything negative about us for not judging them.

June 24, 2009 at 6:02 PM

Romano owes his success to David Letterman and “Home Improvement” started in ’91 while Seinfeld started in ’90, not much paving ‘o the way there if you ask me, but you have a point. You know I’d most likely phrase it that way myself but usually someone comes out of the woodwork and calls me out on my absolutes so here I am *dusts himself off of all the pine tree needles* ;-)

June 24, 2009 at 6:31 PM

I’m not attempting to draw straight lines here, but Jerry Seinfeld was definitely the test case for comedians going straight from night clubs to primetime. For that reason, the next generation owes him a debt of gratitude.

And, not that it makes such a huge difference, but The Seinfeld Chronicles premiered in July of 1989, over two years prior to Home Improvement’s September, 1991, premiere.

… dumps the pine tree needles all over Sebastian … (what the hell are we talking about?)

June 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM

Whatever, I was thinking about how dopeheads are planting cannabis in national forests ;-)

See I knew you had more up your sleeve and of course you are right about this. But let me throw something back at you: Bill Cosby. Kevin Pollak said he’d been listening to Cosby’s standup records when he was a kid, acting as if he was Cosby (what’s that called? Adlibing? Pollak mentioned it, I’m too lazy to listen to 30 hours of podcasts again to find it). I just think that there were standup comics before Seinfeld who paved the way, even though they were less Successful. Cosby Show started in ’84.

OH and I hope you’ve seen

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0500140/

It’s really good.

June 24, 2009 at 8:29 PM

I’m glad you mentioned both things that you did! :-)

I own “I’m Telling You for the Last Time” on DVD, and once had it on CD, before a friend absconded with it, so I also have the tracks on my iPod. It’s awesome, and we will come back to it momentarily.

I also saw “Comedian” in some tiny theater in The Village (NY). Only people who like him appreciated it, which is to say that I loved it.

Anyway, I’m really glad you brought up Cosby. Bill Cosby was, and is, definitely a standup. However, he blazed the frontier for a different group of people: comedic actors. Back in Cosby’s day, you had to do standup in order to break into acting. So we had Steve Martin, and his brethren, who started out in the clubs, because that was the only way into funny roles. Cosby was actually on many things, including “I Spy”, “The Bill Cosby Show”, “The Electric Company”, and “Fat Albert”, to name a few, before “The Cosby Show”. By then he was an actor, and an accomplished one.

Whereas, Seinfeld blazed a path for all the guys who showed up at the cemetery in the opening of “I’m Telling You for the Last Time”. Yes, I know that someone like George Carlin was already established, but my point is that those guys, his contemporaries, were the comedians who scratched their way into acting, not comedic actors. That’s who Romano and Reiser (who was at the cemetery) were.

“Seinfeld” was really the beginning of an interesting decade of the networks giving shows to comedians who, by and large, did not have the comedic intellect of Seinfeld, Romano, Reiser, and others. The most recent iteration of the experiment is the “Sarah Silverman Program”.

June 24, 2009 at 10:18 PM

I’m sure that Seinfeld paved the way for comedians to be the driving forces of their sitcoms…. however, you claim that Paul Reiser and Ray Romano lack comedic intellect. “Mad About You” mined its humor between a couple’s relationship, whereas, “Everybody Loves Raymond” took on the complexities of a family dynamic. The shows are all different and cannot just be lumped into a general category, as you seem wont to do.

June 24, 2009 at 10:44 PM

Sorry, but I’m specifically saying that Seinfeld, Romano, and Reiser are the ones with the high comedic IQ.

And, I’m not lumping anything into one category, other than shows helmed by standups. Check the Flashback category; I wrote a glowing post on Everybody Loves Raymond, too.

June 25, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Ah yes you are right – I forgot that Cosby was well established – even more so I think his I Spy role fell together with “Shaft” and the rise of the Afro-American Cinema, right?

I’m sorry that I’m not “fluent” in these things, that was before I was born and I still proud myself for staying up till 0:30am for 9 years to watch every single episode of cheers – which ran opposite of “Frasier” during that time of day, followed by “Mad about you” and “Home Improvement” til 2am. Yes that was during my schooldays :-)

June 25, 2009 at 2:52 PM

I actually don’t know much about “I Spy”, other than that it existed, was successful, and helped boost Cosby’s career. :-) Could be.

I’m certainly not fluent either. Just a combination of things you pick up over the years when its of interest to you, and research.

You watched every episode of Cheers? I never got that show….

June 26, 2009 at 12:46 PM

I’m a comedy nut. Ok I have to admit I watch almost everything else that’s good too but I’m really into comedy shows. I’m still pissed “Help Me Help You” didn’t get picked up for another season… but then again that might’ve prevented Ted Danson from playing the role of Arthur Frobisher on “Damages” so there’s a bright side there too…

But of course there are better comedy shows. “Frasier” still is at the top for me. Insanely funny show.

I never liked Seinfeld in its original run on german TV but got into it later on. I simply couldn’t get past all those “coincidences” – Ken Levine wrote about breaking the 4th wall recently on his blog and shared the insight that this is something that is established on the show therefor it’s ok (just like on “Curb your Enthousiasm” which I loathe because of those happenstances too).

Anyway I’m rambling I guess :-) I liked this post, just wanted to add that as a final note. You write too much about too many bad shows so this was a welcome change for you I guess ;-)

June 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM

I lucked into doing flashbacks on most of my favorites. It’s a nice opportunity to look back on real quality stuff!

June 25, 2009 at 7:51 AM

my apologies for misreading.

Powered By OneLink