CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

HawthoRNe lacks substance

hawthorne pilotI am in awe of Will Smith. I think that he’s not only a phenomenal actor, but I truly believe that he’s a great guy, under all of that success and fame. So, I’m a bit hesitant to criticize him … but, what the hell: he kind of, sort of, pushed his wife (Jada Pinkett Smith, star and executive producer of HawthoRNe) to do a bum show.

I’m sorry, Mr. Smith!

Alright, all you feminists, who think I’m detracting from Pinkett Smith’s success by even mentioning her husband here, that was all I had to say about him. But, seriously, I’m surprised that people with as much acting pedigree as the Smiths didn’t see HawthoRNe for what it is: a show lacking in any substance.

Look, I’ve only seen as much of the series as you have, and I fully believe that the writers are slowly building up the characters. However, the hook of the series eludes me. The show is billed as headlining a strong, female character, but I don’t see what’s significant about Christina Hawthorne. In fact, if she weren’t constantly being thrown in our faces, she could even drift into the background.

What I have picked up on at this point is how hard the writers are trying to convince us that Christina is all-powerful. Apparently, nothing in the hospital will function without her steady hand to guide it. And, you know, I get that we need to see her compassionate side in dealing with patients, but how beyond the realm of possibility was it to see Christina, Chief Nursing Officer (what the hell kind of title is that?), and Dr. Tom Wakefield (Michael Vartan), Chief of Surgery, conferring over the treatment of one patient? Fantastic use of hospital resources, Richmond Trinity.

The rest of the ensemble are just a bunch of overblown caricatures, thus far. Ray Stein (David Julian Hirsh) suffers through male-nurse jokes, and can’t seem to get paid for his overtime. Bobbie Jackson (Suleka Mathew) is the solid, strong-willed friend, who, in her own life, is scarred and apprehensive about getting close to people (by the way; her EMT is not attractive, let alone a pretty guy). Candy Sullivan (Christina Moore) is meant to seem like an airhead, but probably has the stereotypical ocean of depth lying beneath her lighthearted exterior. And Christina’s daughter, Camille (Hannah Hodson), adds nothing to the show, and is likely only going to be detrimental to where Pinkett Smith might potentially take her series.

And, of course, all of the doctors are buffoons, from the ones who can’t speak English, to the ones too busy playing golf to monitor their patients. Because, how else can you portray strong nurses on television?

Unfortunately, I am unconsciously making some unfavorable comparisons between HawthoRNe and Nurse Jackie, but I believe that a lot of that has to do with their premiering so close together, and both being shows that I’m monitoring. There are a lot of points that seem to be standard for nurse-based shows, judging by these two, and so what annoys me on one hits me harder on the other.

But, to be fair, HawthoRNe is really, thus far, innocuous. I truly believe that there must be some meat on those bones; why else would TNT have picked it up? I just don’t see how, up to this point, it’s trying to be anything but a nice little show with some semi-decent writing, and boring stories. What’s the angle? Where’s the hook?

To be sure, Jada Pinkett Smith is talented, so I know that she can bring the heavy. Is there any to be found on HawthoRNe? I am going to watch next week, but I still wouldn’t bet on my getting into the show (I shockingly got more from this week’s premiere of Merlin, on NBC).

If this goes nowhere, I do think that Pinkett Smith should give TV another shot. She could do a lot with the right vehicle. Don’t quit too soon!

What do you all think about HawthoRNe? Is anyone else watching it?

Photo Credit: TNT

Categories: | Clack | Episode Reviews | General | TV Shows |

14 Responses to “HawthoRNe lacks substance”

June 24, 2009 at 5:50 PM

Yet another show you are covering that you don’t enjoy. But, this time I agree with you.

Yikes is a good comment on this show. Just yikes. There is absolutely nothing good about it. It doesn’t know what it wants to be, for starters. Is it a comedy as the interaction between the Asian doctor and the frightened nurse would lead you to believe? Is it a drama, as the homeless mother and Theo’s arcs would lend? I don’t think they have any idea.

Not only is Christine’s character uninspiring, her role as chief nurse is – I don’t even know. What is that? I get that nurses feel like they get a bad rap next to doctors, but they chose to be nurses, not doctors, right? I assume there is a real job description for them both, with what they are supposed to do and not do.

I didn’t intend to watch last night, but the TV was on TNT and I decided, what the hell? Well, the hell was that I could have watched something that would have drawn me in. TNT does not have a winner on their hands with Hawthorne and I don’t expect it to get renewed based on that, but in my world that usually means a smashing success.

June 24, 2009 at 6:45 PM

‘tis the cross I bear.

Sure, the old “I’m too lazy to change the channel” excuse. You could have reacquainted yourself with Weeds on Showtime! :-)

June 24, 2009 at 5:57 PM

So where’s the evidence that he pushed her?

June 24, 2009 at 6:40 PM

Sorry; I had read it in so many reviews, I didn’t even think to source it. I also read that he was co-executive producing, but I haven’t found anything to support that, though some say he’s “ghost producing”, whatever that means.

Paragraph Six:
https://www.bostonherald.com/entertainment/television/general/view.bg?articleid=1179145

June 24, 2009 at 9:53 PM

Hey TNT why not pick up Body Politic to replace this show.
BP has a good script, sharp dialogue, it is about politic (it is the time now)and romance, the cast is fantastic.
It could be a hit for the channel.

June 28, 2009 at 10:46 AM

I don’t know anything about it, but, the CW, home of 90210, Gossip Girl, and the new Melrose Place, is bringing it to us? It can’t be about much substance if they think it’ll attract their viewers, can it?

June 28, 2009 at 11:38 AM

Simmer down! I won’t speak for 90210 or Melrose place, but Gossip Girl is a surprisingly well written and acted show (if a bit, I at least hope, unrealistic).

The Body Politic pilot has been well received by the critics that got their hands on it, even though CW didn’t pick it up.

June 28, 2009 at 1:33 PM

Admittedly, I’ve only seen some of the first season, but come now … let’s call a spade a spade. ;)

There are shows I watch that I will readily admit have little saving grace, yet I enjoy them nonetheless; Gossip Girl is an over-the-top farce of a premise, and a bit more soap opera for teens than anything else. There’s nothing wrong with enjoying it (though we’ll still make fun of you :-)), but I don’t think it doesn’t fall into the same mix as the rest of The CW fare. It may be better written, or whatever, but that’s just a relative statement.

Again I know nothing about it, but what does it say about Body Politic if The CW passed on it?

June 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM

I don’t know what to say to you, buddy. To me, writing consists of two very distinct parts: Building a story arc, and building good dialogue. Granted, Gossip Girl is based on a premise that few would believe true (But, considering the world that these kids live in, YES, I find it completely realistic that SOME people live like this). That being said, the dialogue and interplay between characters is incredibly well written.

All things considered, it is what it is. But I enjoy the heck out of Gossip Girl.

July 1, 2009 at 4:37 AM

Body Politic is far far better than Gossip Girl (i see the presentation for network) it just not comparable.
The script is better, the cast is much much better, the dialogue is as witty as GG.
Anyway it was not pick up by The CW; the network exec. are thinking their target audience are not interested by the premise (and…POLITIC subject !) = It’s just too clever for this network, that’s all.
Now it seems NBC and ABC are interested for a potential mid-season pick up but their schedule seems already full…
So a pick up by a cable channel could be the solution, no ?

July 1, 2009 at 11:54 AM

I guess we’ll see if/when it makes it to TV. What’s your involvement with the show?

July 2, 2009 at 3:26 AM

I am not involved lol, i just saw the pilot presentation,i swear. But like you said we will see if it will be picked up, if not it will be a waste, that’s all.

July 2, 2009 at 10:15 AM

Hey, there’d be no harm in pushing it if you WERE. I was just curious. :-)

Powered By OneLink