Before the inevitable backlash from people whose favorite shows are hurting for respect and viewers, understand that I realize that the love is mostly in the ratings. I bled when The Wire got panned. I’m fully aware of how only now (if even) are people starting to really respect shows like The Office, 30 Rock, and How I Met Your Mother for the great work that they turn out. At the same time, how many articles have we all read about the lack of respect paid to the above mentioned shows? How many awards have these shows been nominated for at the Globes and the Emmys? Except for The Wire. (Damn it, how did they not get showered with gold statues?)
All the while, NCIS just keeps plodding along, racking up viewer wins Tuesday after Tuesday, earning them all of two Emmy noms, one for stunt coordination and the other for a guest spot. And, what’s that? It stars Mark Harmon? Then this can’t be right.
Unfortunately, it is. NCIS is one of the most overlooked shows on television today. A juggernaut that keeps on serving up excellence every week, but one that we take for granted. Now, you could argue that it’s a procedural, nothing special to be said. So why do I keep reading about CSI or CSI: insert random city here? Or The Mentalist? Or Criminal … (that’s right, Criminal Minds is overlooked as well. Come to think of it, so is Cold Case. Something else to write about later!) NCIS offers up a brilliant cast, witty scripts and smart concepts twenty some-odd times per year. I think its time we take a moment to thank the show.
First of all, the idea behind this show is great. In a reality where new secret agencies are popping up left and right, NCIS focuses on the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, a little-known agency that’s been around for over one hundred and twenty-five years. I love the puzzled looks on people’s faces when characters on the show identify themselves; you can just see the team’s annoyance at their obscurity brimming right beneath the surface. In a television era where we see the inner workings of seemingly every type of police, sheriff, state or federal law enforcement agency, its nice to see one dedicated to, as is its motto, “protecting the people, families, and assets of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps worldwide.” Sure, sometimes that means cases fall into their jurisdiction even when they only brush up against naval personnel, but that’s the government for you.
The main team on the show is just the right balance of incredible. Leroy Jethro Gibbs (Harmon) is unparalleled on TV today in his ability to shock and awe. The first time I saw “the look” I wanted to answer his questions; I just didn’t know how. And I love the fierce loyalty he feels towards his fellow agents, both superiors and subordinates. No matter how many times he slaps Tony (Michael Weatherly) on the back of the head, you know he’d go to hell and back for the guy.
And Anthony (Tony) DiNozzo definitely rates a lot of slaps. I think it was a really interesting choice to make him a movie buff. Half the references that come poring out of his mouth are beyond me, particularly regarding the classics, but so often a character in his role is sketched as the dumb jock. Now, I’m not saying movie trivia passes as intellect, but rather that Tony is a very broad and knowledgeable character, no matter how shallow and sleazy he may seem when it comes to women. And that’s very.
Ziva David (Cote de Pablo) does not do a good Hebrew, but beyond that misstep she was the right choice to replace the poorly cast Sasha Alexander (Kate Todd). I still don’t fully understand why the Israeli Mossad would require a full-time liaison (though she doesn’t act in that capacity anymore) to the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, but that aside, she’s a perfect addition to the team. Ziva brings an ability that’s lacking in the group; she knows what it means to be an agent of an intelligence organization. Gibbs is a former Marine (Gunny!), Tony was a cop, and McGee (Sean Murray) has a background in computers. Not that they don’t bring a tremendous amount of ability to the job, and (wouldn’t you know it!) the perfect mix to the team, but Ziva is an actual agent. Todd was supposed to be as well; she started out as a Secret Service Agent. But she was laughable at best as an agent, which is apparently what the creators wanted the female character to be. Thank you Ari Haswari.
Timothy McGee has grown beautifully by not growing at all. Sure, from time to time he displays a certain grizzled outlook on things, but at heart he is and always will be a “Probie”. The truth is that I wouldn’t have it any other way. I love the fact that he’s also a published author of fiction, something I think the writers have definitely underutilized. His innate ability with computers, something that isn’t specifically part of his job purview, gives the writers the opportunity to expand McGee’s character from new guy to go-to-guy for both Gibbs and Director Leon Vance (Rocky Carroll) whenever they need something done under the digital table.
McGee’s close friendship with Abby Sciuto (Pauley Perrette), the forensic analyst, is also something I’ve enjoyed, though I never quite understood the sexual tension between them. And Abby, as annoying as some of her lovable quirks can be, is woven into the fabric of the show so well that she has very direct and personal relationships with every other member of the team. It’s an aspect of the show that’s been done very well, even if they’ve fallen a bit short of bringing the medical examiner, Ducky Mallard (David McCallum) into everyones’ inner-circle. I suppose I can understand that there’s a professional distance between Ducky and some of the younger members of the team (i.e. almost everyone), but the intense relationship that he and Gibbs clearly share is really something to behold. I wish we could see variations of it between Ducky and everyone else.
As far as bosses go, Director Jenny Shepard (Lauren Holly) would have never been my choice, so I’m not really missing her. Vance could be an interesting character, if only we saw more of him. While Jenny seemed way too involved in the minutia of Gibbs et al., Vance spends too much time off-screen. Maybe this new development with his CIA file will bring him more into the mix.
NCIS also maintains a stable crop of recurring characters, most of whom have been crafted quite well. I’m enjoying the additional screen-time that Jimmy Palmer (Brian Dietzen) has started to get after four years; Palmer could end up being a lot of fun.
NCIS is tremendous, one of the finest hours of television on the air today. Why does it get so little attention after Tuesday nights? You got me. I definitely see plenty of intrigue and excitement going on each and every week. CBS is even in the works for a spin-off, which I have to say is just a terrible idea; I know it worked for CSI, but I feel like NCIS‘s success lies more concretely in the team of players who hit the airwaves week after week. It’s not so much formulaic as it is unique to a particular set of circumstances. And those circumstances meld just right as is.
So, I don’t know. I don’t have a plan of action, nor do I have a goal in mind. All I can say is, let’s make sure not to take this hard worker for granted anymore. This is one show I don’t want to only appreciate after its gone.
We agree on all but two things…
I don’t think you can say Alexander was miscast when it seems that you just didn’t like the character. I liked both her and the character. It was an interesting way to introduce NCIS and how and what they investigate through the eyes of a new agent. And I thought that she was a great foil (although completely different kind than Ziva) for Tony.
Secondly, I’d like to remind you that NCIS itself was a spinoff of JAG. A completely different kind of show, and superior… The new spin off could go the same route, and doesn’t have to be the derivative dreck that are the CSI spin off (the dreck IMHO).
*POST AUTHOR*
I definitely did not like the character of Agent Todd. And while normally I would agree that my saying that Alexander was miscast would be an exaggeration, in this case I actually do feel that way. Two or three summers ago, my wife and I found ourselves with little or nothing to watch on TV. So, we set about trying new shows, recording reruns of a variety of comedies, dramas and procedurals. NCIS was one such experiment, and those first few episodes that we saw were with Ziva. Once we decided that we enjoyed the show, we waited for USA to start running it from the beginning. Having seen the dynamics of the team and show with Ziva, I had an idea of what type of character the female agent could and should be. So seeing Sasha Alexander AFTER Cote de Pablo left me with the distinct impression that Alexander was simply wrong for the role of “female agent with experience as an agent.” The good thing was that I knew she wasn’t going to last for long ;)
As far as JAG is concerned, we started watching NCIS from the very beginning: the JAG episodes entitled “Ice Queen” and “Meltdown”. While NCIS was technically a spin-off, it was one of those introduce a character on a popular show and then pilot a new show for them in the fall. The NCIS spin-off discussion is of taking the structure of the current show and throwing in new characters, like when we were blessed with “Saved by the Bell: The New Class”. Even “Joey” was better than that. It could be good, by why risk tarnishing the image?
By that logic Private Practice isn’t a spinoff of Grey’s Anatomy. GA, was just a device to introduce the characters through the same backdoor pilot nature utilized on JAG.
(What’s that you say, that the character of Addison Shepard moving from one to the other makes it a spinoff? Well, if you could make an argument that the character of Addison on PP bears any resemblance to the character of the same name that was on Grey’s, then I would concede).
(The purpose of this post was not to argue the nature of spinoffs, but just to go off topic and make fun of two shows I like)
*POST AUTHOR*
Funny, but as I was typing my first response I was thinking of the third type of spin-off, the fully developed character who leaves for their own show. I’ve always had difficulty accepting that the two are really connected; you can’t tell me that Frasier Crane on Cheers and on Frasier are one and the same. But I accept that the definition of spin-offs requires that they be categorized as such.
Addison Forbes Montgomery:Addison Montgomery Shepherd, as Frasier Crane in Boston:Frasier Crane in Seattle, as PP:GA, as Cheers:Frasier. Wait, what?
Wouldn’t it be AFM:AMS as Seattle Crane:Boston Crane?
And yes, we’re way to geeky.
*POST AUTHOR*
:-)
I think only if I’d used a double :: to connect the two analogies would I have needed them to be congruous … is that geeky too?
First, yes it is. Second, right or wrong, it just sounds better that way :)
I agree that the cast is what makes the show. Without those charming characters it’s just another procedural. I am especially thankful that they are not moving Tony to the new show by promoting him, a promotion he already turned down once.
*POST AUTHOR*
Let’s hope. The best thing that can happen is for the spin-off to either take off or completely tank. If it ends up hovering in the middle, like Private Practice, they could end up sending in some reinforcements from the original.
I am an NCIS newbie. I got hooked when USA ran marathons over the Christmas/New Year holiday block.
While I can enjoy a procedural, it has to be relatively well written (disqualifying Criminal Minds) and have interesting characters (disqualifying CSI and its ilk).
NCIS gives me what I want from a procedural: fun writing, fun character interactions, and just enough cool new information I can verify on my own.
The 5 and 6 pm showings on USA have come full circle and begun the show from the beginning. It is interesting seeing how the characters have changed, both organically through development and by the creators deciding to change them. Case in point, there was an episode where they go to Gitmo, and Tony doesn’t know anything about Alan Ladd or the movie Shane. I think his movie buff cred had yet to be introduced, but it made for a funny double take for me.
*POST AUTHOR*
I remember having the same experience with most of the characters. It’s funny to see the after before the before.
Thank you for writing this article. I’ve watched NCIS on and off for the past few years, but my addiction truly started with season 5 & 6 after watching USA repeats. I wish more of my friends watched it, so I actually had someone to discuss it with ;)
While NCIS might seem like an unwatched show, this year they’ve definitely received more well-deserved accolades. I think more people are watching (specifically myself) due to the presentation shift. Back in the day Jethro vocalized his thought process, but now he just expects his team to act on his expectations (which cuts dialogue and makes the show move quicker). Plus, with the addition of Probie & Ziva and the forensics folks participating moreso in the crimesolving, it’s definitely a fuller team.
I didn’t warm to Todd, but I liked how together she appeared & her profiling contributions to the team. I love Ziva’s personality, but she’s definitely more an agent than a crimesolver. However, season 4 addressed the reason for Ziva joining.
As a woman I loved Director Jenny. But the harsh, suit-wearing one of Season 4. I know people probably hated that version, but I hated season 3 & 5’s version of her. If she’s in charge of a military federal agency, what was up with the pastel and business casual outfits they placed her in?
Please post on this again!
*POST AUTHOR*
I always thought Jenny was wearing an “ill-fitting” suit. I think her character might have been great if we’d been able to experience her as an agent. It was the managerial role that became her undoing, which was too bad.
Thanks for the interest! There’s definitely a lot to say about the show, and I have a feeling that the next few episodes might be rather interesting if they focus at all on Vance’s storyline…
I can definitely see that had you experienced Ziva first, there’s a distinct difference.
But there is also a big difference between an NCIS ‘Agent,’ a Secret Service Agent, and a Mossad operative. So much so that to compare Ziva and Todd as “agents” just seems weird.
One of my favorite things about this show that goes so incredibly unnoticed is their incredible attention to continuity. It really shines when you watch everything in a row. Like all through Season 2 when the “picture search” of Ari would be happening on monitors in the background of the bullpen, to Tony’s referencing Agent Caitlyn Todd to Gibbs during a hostage situation to indicate that someone was dead, to Ziva wearing the orange hat of the runner after he had died in S4 (Four, right?), this show likes to tie itself together as much as possible. Its much more “real” in that since because our personal history defines us so much, but it seems that in televised drama, things that happened in past episodes don’t have nearly as much affect on the present as they do in real life.
*POST AUTHOR*
Couldn’t agree more. I find too many shows forgetting what they stated in previous episodes. NCIS follows through every time.
Although, have you noticed that they sometimes neglect to fully resolve an episode’s mystery? On the one hand I like that, because it places the one-off case secondary to the characters. On the other hand, sometimes its just nice to know what the hell happened.
And yes, season four. I believe the episode you’re referencing is #16: Dead Man Walking.
D-ster – You’re right, I watched eps in the past, but I didn’t become addicted until recently. When I re-watched the old eps, I almost didn’t click with Todd as I compared her to Ziva. I probably compared the two as they were women and I expected slightly similar character roles. Once I dropped my expectations, I respected Todd more. Also, compared with S’s 1-2 yrs, de Pablo has had more time to relate to the cast & they’ve written her as a warmer character.
On a side note, A, regarding Z, I don’t really think NCIS would accept a foreign operative in daily top-secret cases unless as an occasional consultant (as she started out). If she tried to join full-time, I assume they’d farm her out to CIA (as Jethro 1st suggested) or use her in a lower-level, more mundane place. After all, the real NCIS denied the Aussie showrunner access to their HQ.
Regarding NCIS’ Emmy count, I think it might deserve them for writing or for best cast, but not for individual acting. It’s a good show, but Harmon barely speaks anymore & the show is more about the team. Also, altho’ characters might go ‘off the grid,’ they’re still trained professionals, so you won’t catch them crying too much. I think this reflects the show’s realism. Also, it stays true to the characters & where they work, but, on both counts there are very few opportunities for the actors to shine . . .
*POST AUTHOR*
No argument here that the show shouldn’t be bringing home any acting awards. But plenty of shows are recognized only as a group. I definitely agree with you that NCIS should be one of them. Maybe next year…
I could say that I liked Todd because I’ve always been a big fan of Shasha Alexander, but in comparison, I’ve been a massive Lauren Holly fan since Picket Fences, and couldn’t stand her on this show.
IF there is a spinoff, the only way I see making it work is two things.
One bring us a character a lot of us NCIS fans are already in love with. NCIS takes place in the same world as JAG – Have Gunny from JAG (played so well by Randy Vasquez whom I haven’t seen on tv in a long time) be a part of the new team – after all Gibbs is former marine, we could have Gunny as either assigned to the new group for some reason or have him leave the marines again.
(That or bring Steven Culp on to either show as Webb – I mean the CIA has to deal with NCIS too – bring us our people! (I was a fan of all the minor characters on JAG if you can’t tell, but I do think tying a character in – WITHOUT breaking up the current NCIS team would make a new show feel like an old one much more quickly and lead to success)
Second – they’ve got to work with what worked in the first part – a team of characters whom you love – I can’t STAND DiNozzo – but he’s still so loveable in his own way because he is a part of the NCIS family. You can’t be trying to actively have someone recognizably in the “Abby” role or obviously in the “Gibbs” role personality wise, but they should somehow fit together in similar but interesting ways…
In season 1 or 2 … often the characters (lawyers) from JAG would appear as their JAG characters on NCIS …
The spinoff series could easily be about one of the “Agents Afloat” … on an aircraft carrier or some such ship (or more than one) … would also allow for the usual NCIS team to show up occasionally for serious cases.
*POST AUTHOR*
Could be a cool idea, but word has it that the show’s about an LA-based team of undercover NCIS agents. Mark Harmon is reportedly not happy with the spin-off idea.
The series hasn’t been ordered, but the premise will air on a spring episode of NCIS.
For a weird preview of the characters, see Ausiello on EW.com:
https://ausiellofiles.ew.com/ncis/
I think Bud was the only one to show up in season one as himself… but I’ve always thought they didn’t take advantage of some of the good folks they had on JAG… I have no desire to see Harm or Mac return – but a brief appearance by Webb or Gunny would really make my day (and probably wouldn’t irritate any of the folks who didn’t watch JAG because it wouldn’t have to be a huge thing) so I’ve never understood why they haven’t, unless Steven Culp and Randy Vasquez just have no desire to be on NCIS…
I love the idea of introducing Webb in the instance of any CIA liaisons.