CliqueClackWhy does The Big Bang Theory hate nerds?
‘The Big Bang Theory’ is ostensibly about nerds, but then why does it secretly hate them?
Because the episode immediately subverts this message in four different ways. First you get the weird looks from other people and someone ripping off Glee by throwing a damn Slurpee at Sheldon. Then you get Sheldon (of all people) saying he’s ashamed. That is so totally out of character I was furious at the show for making me invested in and caring about these stupid stereotypes. The guys are punished for their love of Star Trek by getting their car stolen because they left the keys in the ignition. That’s just lazy writing.
And then there’s the other subplot — the girls and their interest in comic books. Do I understand the point of the storyline? Sure. It’s about that, while the girls initially don’t get why the guys are interested in what they refer to as “juvenile entertainment,” they are eventually drawn in and finally get why they are interesting. They even make a few legitimately nerdy references — Fables (incorrectly called “Fable”) is mentioned as a good starting point for people unfamiliar with comics (true) and the minutiae of Thor’s magic hammer is also discussed. Couple of problems though. First of all, there are a lot of comics only intended for older readers, and the lingering idea of comics as “kids only” is insulting (even if the comics industry isn’t helping much either, if we’re being honest). So we see the theoretical plan of the episode’s arc for the girls: their realization that maybe the guys aren’t so crazy or weird for loving comic books. That sounds like a positive message to me. But then it goes all to pieces.
We simply must have horribly boring jokes about comic book patrons literally staring at these “girls” like they’ve never seen them before. Boring. And then immediately Penny wants to read a Thor comic because “he’s hot,” I guess indicating that everyone, guys and girls, are shallow (true, but come on). They then initially say the comic books are stupid and illogical, while making “dumb blonde” jokes at Penny’s expense (lazy and trite). After reading more, they turn into the most annoying sort of nerds, arguing pedantically about minutiae without any actual appreciation for the art itself. Angry without reason, insulting each other personally over minor details. All the while the guys stand nervously outside, wondering what’s wrong and thinking it makes no sense at all.
It’s one thing to be passionate — it’s quite another to imply that people only like reading comic books because they like arguing about them. That’s just so stupid I can hardly begin to deconstruct it. The comic books (as explained in the brilliant Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art by Scott McCloud) is just another form of artistic expression — “sequential art,” one that has been around in one form or another for millenia. Have there been stupid, even infantile examples of this art form? Of course, just like every art form. But comics can be — and are — appreciated for intricate storylines, beautiful and inventive artwork and fascinating manipulations of time and space in the visual domain. I could go on for a while, but that would be pointless.
Because for every nerdy reference The Big Bang Theory makes, it makes a dozen more jokes at the nerds’ expense. At this point, I should just expect that the show has devolved into a stale, typical sitcom, with maybe a few laughs per episode but ultimately just as empowering for nerds as The Bachelor is for romantics or 2 Broke Girls is for humans with the capacity for humor. Meaning not at all and actually worse, in case I wasn’t totally obvious. Maybe one day it’ll be a good example again, but I’m not holding my breath.
13 Comments on “Why does The Big Bang Theory hate nerds?”
I didn’t see this particular episode, since I gave up on the show at the end of last season, mostly for the reasons you list here. The first 2 seasons of BBT were fantastic, and very funny–the show was laughing WITH the characters, not at them. They were interested in things besides comic books and sci-fi movies, and were shown as bright, intellectual, productive members of society. By the end of the first season, Penny had grown out of that dumb blonde caricature and was holding her own with the 4 of them, filling in for their lack of social skills and common sense.
Then the show turned on its main characters. I don’t have too much objection to Howard’s girlfriend (now wife), but I really seriously hated the unfunny, creepy female clone of Sheldon who was brought on to be his “girlfriend”. Her scenes were grating and obnoxious.
They turned the dial WAY up on Sheldon’s not-Aspergers, and refocused the show around how miserable he made the lives of his 3 friends. They dumbed down the characters and their nerdy interests to make them even more juvenile. It became a noisy, rude sitcom (and I say this as someone who watches, and even sometimes enjoys, “Two and a Half Men”, which is noisy and rude in the right way).
Of course, with that devolving, the show became immensely popular. What a shame. I sometimes watch my DVDs of the first 2 seasons, and wish that program was still on the air.
I’ve expressed similar complaints about the show in the comments on CC before. The show is just poor and sloppy. We got the first 2 seasons on DVD to catch up with the show, which we did like. Then in season 3 the show stopped being funny to us and we dropped it from the DVR. Right about the time Katie made her “I’m tired of Penny” post. The show got old fast to us. I was upset with the constant recycling of plot and jokes. I went into my Dentists just back in may and we got to talking because he is my Uncle and I made a math joke. To frame this, He is one of the smartest and one of the persons I respect the most, and he compared me to Sheldon on it. Then he gushed about the show for a bit. It was really uncomfortable. Maybe the appeal of these shows is just how every-man it is, or how familiar it is to us, in that it’s laughing at nerds and nerdom rather than with. I’ve seen it other places before, calling BBT the Bully picking on the nerds again.
I also heard about the “Girls Trip” to the Comics store on Tumblr, and all it felt like was more rampant use of bad and poor stereotypes as jokes for cheap laughs. It makes you feel bad for any girl who is a fan of comics and their characters. I know the DC Nation fandom was full of people upset at the portrayal, but not surprised from where it came from. Regardless, nice write up, I would hope that BBT grows up a little bit, but given who it is, who’s watching it, and it’s numbers I really doubt it ever will.
What I want to know is why some famous geeks in media LOVE this show then. Wil Wheaton can’t say enough good things about it, though honestly he may be biased at this point. But Andy Ihnatko (Sun Times wroter, podcaster, intelligent dude) seems to LOVE it as well. So why are they so quick to gloss over the issues?
In fairness, Wil Wheaton had a pretty good set of episodes. But he hasn’t been back in a while. Hmm.
Best not to overuse guest stars, its what makes their appearance special. Why we haven’t seen Sheldon’s sister again is a mystery and what about Leonard’s Dad or siblings. As the show continues these things may
come to pass.
Not just “famous geeks in media” but Nobel laureates as well because the show utilizes real, actual science in its jokes (look up professor Kostya Novoselov and this link https://thebigblogtheory.wordpress.com/2011/02/03/s04e14-the-thesbian-catalyst/) I be surprised if any of the critics the Big Bang Theory show has even heard of this guy but oh well.
There has never been a single sitcom that has this many celebrated academic intellectuals on it. Ever. And please also note that one of its cast main cast members is even a published scientist. Her field of study is exactly the same as her characters’… except with less animal testing maybe.
If you don’t enjoy the show, that’s fine. Comedy is entirely subjective. If you want to know why some fans such as Neil de Grasse Tyson, George Smoot, Brian Greene and Mike Massimino watch it, you’ll need to ask them. I personally love the show because I’m a Trekkie and I love the science jokes.
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the blog hasn’t been updated since 2011. And my point is that the show has degraded over time, especially since then. I don’t consider this a nerdy show anymore, just a sitcom. That’s the biggest indictment I can throw at it.
“Degraded” is of course entirely subjective and it’s an opinion you’re perfectly entitled to. However, just because a particular blog stopped pointing out and explaining the science within the sitcom does not make the actual science portrayed in the show any less true. And please note that quite a few scientists have publicly stated their enjoyment of the sitcom well into 2013.
https://lightyears.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/03/bee-species-named-after-big-bang-theory-catchphrase/
https://scienceblogs.com/principles/2013/02/12/the-big-bang-theory-and-social-science/
Bear in mind that in the second link, the author, a Associate Professor in the Department of Physics, is not even a huge fan. But on a whole I agree with one of his initial statement: this show has a net positive to science to the general population. Which is a good thing in my mind.
ScottH writes: “the show was laughing WITH the characters, not at them.”
This. The reason I like the shpw less and less is exactly this.
But even a better BBT would still be a sitcom that pokes fun at things. No clichees anymore would mean being plain boring. Penny reads Thor because he’s hot? That’s just in character. It was in-character statement from season one episode one.
If this show would become just another show to educate the audience with today en vogue mainstream politically correct pseudo-anti-stereotypes it really wouldn’t help it. It’s got enough of this already…
From my biased perspective, none of these things bother me. That doesn’t mean I find BBT universally funny, but I do watch each week and enjoy.
There is something very disappointing in using the whole “Girls?? In a nerdy place?? THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE!” trope being used over and over and over. Jeremy touched on how insulting this is to nerdy guys (and it is), but it’s just as hard for girls when we just want to be treated like any other fan and yet somehow we’re still “the other” when it comes to nerdy places and events. And shows like this just perpetuate those old stereotypes.
Its a sit-com, on a TV broadcast network.Gonna be safe and full of
TV tropes to attract a broad audience.
That said, I find it funny and admire the actors and the writing on the show.
What was true once is still true. Don’t like a show? Change the channel.
Yes, Sheldon Cooper of the sitcom Big Bang Theory. Lots of us know about this character played by Jim Parsons. You could say that Sheldon is a classic example of a weird friend. Initially, I thought Sheldon was an alien from outer space. The way he behaves, his figurative mode of speech was unusual and seriously discrete. If you take a character analysis of Sheldon ways of living, mannerism, it could sometimes flabbergast you. Why? Because you have a person like his friends Leonard, Howard, and Rajesh have an extensive collection of superhero toys in which Flash is his favorite. Man! You will split into laughter, when you see in an episode where he dresses up as the Flash after drinking five cups of coffee. He gets so energized and intoxicated that he just speeds out of the apartment into the street in the Flash costume. `
Find out about our very own web portal too
<="https://www.caramoan.ph/caramoan-minalahos-island/